requestId:68499addf0efe5.75201976.
Fu Fei: Grasping the Depth of Life in the Dark Forest
——The Philosophical Explanation of “Three Bodies”Bao HaimeiReading and Other
Accessor: Wu Fei
Accessor: Bao Shu (science fiction writer, formerly known as Li Jun, was studying in Beijing and Luwen, Belgium, and has started sci-fi creation since 2010)
Baobao.com Source: “Pengpai News”
Time: Confucius was in the 2570th year of Jihai October 16th, Guichou
� About two months ago, a partner told me that Wu Feishi, a major student from Beijing, wrote a philosophical interpretation of the “Three Bodies”, which made me feel very surprised to “break the wall of the dimension”. Indeed, in the past four or five years, “Three Bodies” has become a masterpiece, affecting the science fiction world far beyond the meaning, and has already read a lot of science fiction in science and technology, literature, future, business, etc. However, when philosophical exploration of metaphysical ways, it is often beyond the name and absolute, mysterious and mysterious. How can it be combined with concrete and subtle novels? There are occasionally such books abroad, and they also use some novel settings (such as “Can the Matrix exist?” and “Can robots be humanized” to popularize several philosophical knowledge and be more slim with the novel’s own relationship.
The author’s ingredient is another reason that makes me feel strange. Wu Feishi taught me as a quasi-knowledge. In 2005, after obtaining a doctorate at Harvard, he entered the Department of Philosophy. At that time, I studied in the department. Although I had never chosen Teacher Wu’s course, I was lucky enough to get to know him and had a little bit of a teacher’s degree. I remember that there is a chapter in the essay on the essay “Phaedo” that analyzes Plata. At that time, Teacher Wu published a related article, which is my main reference material. It was a very bad victim and I have also asked Teacher Wu for related questions in person. After graduating, I went abroad to study. Later, I “did not work hard to do a regular job” and simply wrote science fiction novels, but I also paid attention to Teacher Wu’s academic knowledge. For more than ten years, he has studied the profound Augustin theology and the theory of human science of matriarchal clans. In recent years, he has turned to traditional Chinese tribute. For example, he has compiled a book called “The Conquest of the Zhengshi” by Zhang Xigong, a Qing Dynasty man. His spirit and his multifaceted aspects are rare in the academic world. But no matter what, it is beyond my imagination that he can pay attention to “Three Bodies”. I think this interpretation must bring the author’s own problem consciousness and deep thought, andThe above-mentioned “heat-scratch” writing method is different.
Just when I felt it was amazing, Peng Pai News and Sanlian Bookstore contacted me and asked me to have an interview with Wu Feifei on this book – if I knew that I was a student who was once Teacher Wu, and now I am a science fiction writer. I dare not respond concisely, one is that I am afraid that this book will be too profound and the interview will not be possible; the other is that I am afraid that the understanding will go too far, and it is difficult to cooperate in the discussion. So I first asked for a book to see. The result proves that these concerns are complete and unnecessary. Although this book “The Depth of Life – Philosophical Explanation of the Three Bodies” is just a thin book, it carries the author’s thoughts on the meaning of life over the years, tightening the meaning of life, and analyzes the novel’s story in analytical way, without scaring readers with impolite theoretical and artistic linguistics. It is as heavy as it is, and it is intriguing. Readers who have different landscapes can have some understanding as long as they are willing to think together. Of course, there are also many confusions in this, which made me think more clearly about the reason behind it after reading it, so I agreed to this interview and had a more profound conversation with Teacher Wu Feifei.
Bao Tree: Hello, Teacher Wu Feifei! I remember that the last time I met you, I was still a little surprised when I compared you to the book “The Depth of Life” which reads the trilogy of “Three Bodies” at a Chinese philosophy meeting. Although many philosophers are interested in and versatile, they are still abstracted by the philosophical teachings that ordinary public understand and cited in the book and wrote in-depth and unpredictable theoretical articles. If you say that you will discuss literary works, the more “elegant” Yangchun Baixue is usually the same, like Nietzsche commenting on Wagner, or Heidegger explains how to read Holderlin, then how could you be interested in a pure science fiction novel like “Three Bodies” and be willing to write a book? Not only you, but from your preface, I saw that it was Teacher Zhao Tingyang who made a draft with you and Teacher Yang Lihua, and published a special topic in “Philosophy Dynamics”. A science fiction novel that has caused such attention to the philosophical world is often rare. So first I would like to ask you to discuss the origin of this book. Although some of it has been discussed in the preface, I think the master will be more interested in the clever scores of “Three Bodies” and the philosophical world.
Fu Fei:Thank you Bao Chuan. I mentioned in the preface to “Deep Life” that writing a book about “Three Bodies” is not in my plan, but it is a very occasionally result. At the beginning, I just wanted to complete a essay. I personally like to read various literary works, and I touch my literary works or film works, and I occasionally write some comments. My collection of essays “The Shocking and Consolation of the World” and “Modern Resources of Modern Career” are all spent.Some articles like this. But none of these are for comments, but often related to the academic issues I am concerned about. In recent years, as independent arrangements have become less and less time, this kind of reading and writing has become a luxury. When I was doing this comment, I didn’t know whether it was a clean reading or a serious work. The key is that the main problems I touched here are not the main ones, whether I can touch me. The questions discussed in “Three Bodies” have made many philosophers interested. In addition to the two Yang Lihua and Zhao Tingyang you mentioned, many people have also been inspired by thoughts and believe that they have touched on the most basic philosophical problems.
Bao Tree:But I have a question. I talked to some of my friends about your explanation of reading “Three Bodies”. Many people’s first reaction is very strange: novels are virtual stories, how can we read philosophy from it? Although the statement is relatively rough, it actually reflects the “politeness and philosophy” competition since ancient times. I have also mentioned your new work to Liu. Liu said he has not read it yet, but he felt very shocked, afraid that he would make up his makeup. Then Baoqing, she looked down at the audience and saw that several thoughts were too simple and there was nothing to explain. Of course, this must be overstatement. But I still want to understand that you have considered the problem of explaining the way of reading philosophical thinking from literature, especially as science fiction novels, and you are highly utopian. For example, the universe and social science and secret forestry laws cannot be regarded as the long-term cultivation method of the universe that is objective, nor is it a theoretical viewpoint proved by the author, but a setting of the novel. So how can you deal with the potential conflict between the philosophy you have read and the virtual nature of your novel?
Fu Fei: Of course, I have not regarded these cosmic laws as object-oriented existence. The story is virtual, but it does not seem that the truth is virtual. Hobbs talks about the natural state and Darwin talks about the source of species, why isn’t he telling a story? The various scientific paradigms that have existed in history must be correct, but they all include major philosophical problems, which can create deep thoughts and even deeply change the reality of our lives. Philosophical facts can often be read in good literary works, which is no longer a very new thing. In science fiction, we not only include our ability to understand the universe where we live, but also our understanding of the fate of human beings and the world, and even the essence of life. I am not familiar with science fiction novels myself, and I think “Three” is very different from most science fiction works in East China. A huge cosmic event constructed by the author, touching on many eternal philosophical problems such as life, the universe, war, and humanity. ThisThese problems will not change with the changes of the times, nor will they have the most basic changes with the changes in the concepts of the universe, but there will be differences in the methods of asking. Therefore
發佈留言